Analyzing offside rules in Serie A
I’m thinking about an episode in Serie A where a referee mistakenly called offside on a goal kick, possibly in September 2021. The user seems frustrated with the refereeing quality. They might be prompting me to explain that offside can’t be given from a goal kick and to analyze the situation: why it’s a mistake, and the role of VAR. The key point is that VAR can only intervene for clear errors leading to goals, penalties, or red cards, but not in this instance since it was a restart.Clarifying VAR protocol in football
I’m considering VAR protocol, which can’t review situations like non-reviewable restarts, such as free kicks. An offside call is only reviewable if a goal is scored, not if the referee blows the whistle beforehand. In this case, the referee whistled offside from a goal kick, which by law can’t happen. If there's a significant law misapplication, like wrongfully awarding a free kick, a competition might allow for a replay. It’s intriguing how these situations play out in various leagues, like in the Bundesliga or Premier League.Explaining potential replays in Serie A
I’m thinking about a past incident in FIFA 2006 where a replay occurred due to a misapplied encroachment penalty in the Uzbekistan vs. Bahrain match. In Serie A, replays are typically rare, but if a law is misapplied, it could prompt one. Since the user mentioned a headline, I should ask if they’d like an explanation. I’ll clarify that offside can’t be called from a goal kick, which is a misstep. If the referee had realized immediately, they could restart with a dropped ball.Clarifying offside rules on goal kicks
I’m considering how a goal kick works. The ball is in play once it’s kicked and definitely moves. Only the goalkeeper or a teammate can be the kicker. Offside occurs when a player receives the ball from a teammate unless it’s from a goal kick. The rule specifies that there’s no offside if a player receives it directly from a goal kick, throw-in, or corner. So if a player is offside after a teammate touches the ball, that’s valid. This means the initial call would be incorrect if a player was offside directly from the goal kick.
简单说法：球门球不存在越位。把球门球判成越位，属于规则性错误。
要点
- 规则依据：IFAB 比赛规则 第11条（越位）明确写明——球员“直接接到球门球、界外球或角球”时不构成越位。
- 何为“直接”：球从球门球开出后，未被任何人再次触球，接球者就拿到球，这叫直接；一旦中途被队友二次触球，后续接球者就恢复正常越位判定。
- 本次争议：若拉齐奥前场球员是直接接到本方球门球却被判越位，这就是误判（更严格地说是误用规则）。
- VAR为何不改判：这类“错误适用规则”的中断，通常不在VAR可介入的四类情形之内；而且裁判已鸣哨中断，协议不支持“倒回改成掉球”去纠法。
- 后果与追责：联赛层面多为内部考评/停哨；重赛极罕见，只有在俱乐部提出申诉且被认定为“误用规则影响比赛”时才可能。
如果你有那段视频或时间点，我可以帮你逐帧说明“是否为直接接球”，把边界情形讲清楚。也可以贴出第11条相关原文和几张示意图来快速分辨哪些情况会/不会越位。